Determining an optimal posturography dataset to identify standing behaviors in the post-stroke subacute phase. Cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: A key issue for posturography is the expression of robust results, in a simplified way. Most studies of individuals post-stroke concern the chronic phase, with small sample sizes. OBJECTIVES: By reducing the number of posturographic indices, we aimed to determine an optimal dataset and understand typical postural behaviors in the subacute post-stroke phase. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study ancillary to the DOBRAS cohort, individuals were assessed as soon they could complete a full posturography session (with and without vision) after a first hemispheric stroke. Body-weight distribution on the mediolateral (ML) axis, position of the center of pressure on the antero-posterior (AP) axis, and postural sway on both axes were computed. Balance ability in daily life was quantified with the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke. Data were analyzed by principal component and hierarchical clustering analyses as well as multiple linear regression. RESULTS: We enrolled 95 individuals (median age: 67.0 years [Q1; Q3 56.0; 72.0]; 68% males). Vision suppression had a marginal effect, only increasing postural sway. Regardless of the visual condition, posturographic behavior was captured by a set of 3 indices that explained almost all the information. One postural sway index (ML or AP) gave more information (48%) than both position indices (ML 26% and AP 15%). These 3 indices identified 3 standing behaviors: 1) stable and symmetric, 2) asymmetric, unstable, and positioned backward, and 3) very unstable and positioned forward. Balance ability in daily life was explained (49% of the information, 95%CI [35; 63]) by weight-bearing asymmetry and postural sway on the ML axis, which played an independent role (both p<10-5), with similar impact. CONCLUSIONS: Three typical behaviors allow standing after stroke: described by only 3 posturographic indices. Weight-bearing asymmetry is not the primary parameter and should not be considered in isolation as an outcome. To increase the feasibility of posturography in the early subacute phase and to simplify evaluation sessions, trials could be limited to eyes open. REGISTRATION: NCT03203109.

Effects of prismatic adaptation on balance and postural disorders in patients with chronic right stroke: protocol for a multicentre double-blind randomised sham-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with right stroke lesion have postural and balance disorders, including weight-bearing asymmetry, more pronounced than patients with left stroke lesion. Spatial cognition disorders post-stroke, such as misperceptions of subjective straight-ahead and subjective longitudinal body axis, are suspected to be involved in these postural and balance disorders. Prismatic adaptation has showed beneficial effects to reduce visuomotor disorders but also an expansion of effects on cognitive functions, including spatial cognition. Preliminary studies with a low level of evidence have suggested positive effects of prismatic adaptation on weight-bearing asymmetry and balance after stroke. The objective is to investigate the effects of this intervention on balance but also on postural disorders, subjective straight-ahead, longitudinal body axis and autonomy in patients with chronic right stroke lesion. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial, we will include 28 patients aged from 18 to 80 years, with a first right supratentorial stroke lesion at chronic stage (≥12 months) and having a bearing ≥60% of body weight on the right lower limb. Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental group (performing pointing tasks while wearing glasses shifting optical axis of 10 degrees towards the right side) or to the control group (performing the same procedure while wearing neutral glasses without optical deviation). All participants will receive a 20 min daily session for 2 weeks in addition to conventional rehabilitation. The primary outcome will be the balance measured using the Berg Balance Scale. Secondary outcomes will include weight-bearing asymmetry and parameters of body sway during static posturographic assessments, as well as lateropulsion (measured using the Scale for Contraversive Pushing), subjective straight-ahead, longitudinal body axis and autonomy (measured using the Barthel Index). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethical review board in France. Findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals relative to rehabilitation or stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03154138.

Publication language and the estimate of treatment effects of physical therapy on balance and postural control after stroke in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Findings regarding the impact of language bias on treatment effect estimates (TEE) are conflicting, and very few studies have assessed these impacts in rehabilitation. The purpose was to compare TEE between studies published in non-English language (SPNEL) and those published in English language (SPEL) included in a previously published meta-analysis assessing the effects of physical therapy on balance and postural control after stroke. METHODS: Six databases were searched until January 2019. Two independent reviewers selected randomised trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We conducted subgroup meta-analyses according to the language of study publication, then compared TEE between SPEL and SPNEL subgroups by using a random-effects meta-regression model. RESULTS: From 13,123 records, 132 SPEL (n = 5219) and 13 SPNEL (n = 693) were included. SPNEL had a weight in the pooled estimate (8.2%) significantly lower than SPEL (91.8%; p<0.001). Compared to SPEL, SPNEL had both significantly worse methodological quality (p = 0.002) and quality of reporting for blinding of outcome assessment (p<0.001); and a significantly worse quality of reporting for incomplete outcome data (p<0.001). SPNEL had a significantly worse precision (i.e. inverse of variance) of TEE than SPEL (p = 0.005). Overall, the TEE was not significantly different between SPNEL and SPEL (standardised mean difference -0.16, 95% confidence interval [-0.53; 0.22], heterogeneity I2 = 78%). However, when PT was compared to sham treatment or usual care, SPNEL significantly over-estimated treatment effects (SMD -0.68, 95%CI [-1.03; -0.33], I2 = 39%) compared to SPEL. Restriction of the search to SPEL only did not change the direction of TEE for 8 out of 9 comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: SPNEL had a worse methodological quality than SPEL and were likely to over-estimate treatment effect. If inclusion of SPNEL in a systematic review is considered to be relevant, the impact of such studies on TEE should be explored by sensitivity analyses to ensure the findings validity.

Limited evidence of physical therapy on balance after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stroke results in balance disorders and these directly affect autonomy and quality of life. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of physical therapy (PT) on balance and postural control after stroke. METHODS: We included all randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of PT on balance and postural control in adult patients after stroke without language restriction. Medline, Embase/Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Pascal, and Francis databases were searched until January 2019. Primary outcomes were balance (Berg Balance scale and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke) and postural control with postural deviation or stability measurement in sitting or standing static evaluation. A pair of independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses with subgroups (categories of PT, time post-stroke, and lesion location) and meta-regression (duration of PT) were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 145 studies (n = 5912) were selected from the 13,123 records identified. For balance, evidence was found in favor of the efficacy of functional task-training alone (standardized mean difference 0.39, 95% confidence interval [0.09; 0.68], heterogeneity I2 = 63%) or associated with musculoskeletal intervention and/or cardiopulmonary intervention (0.37, [0.19; 0.55], I2 = 48%), electrostimulation (0.91, [0.49; 1.34], I2 = 52%) immediately after intervention, compared to sham treatment or usual care (ST/UC). For postural deviation eyes open, assistive devices were more effective than no treatment (-0.21, [-0.37; -0.05], I2 = 0%) immediately after intervention; for postural stability eyes open, functional task-training and sensory interventions were more effective than ST/UC (0.97, [0.35; 1.59], I2 = 65% and 0.80, [0.46; 1.13], I2 = 37% respectively) immediately after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Functional task-training associated with musculoskeletal intervention and/or cardiopulmonary intervention and sensory interventions seem to be immediately effective in improving balance and postural stability, respectively. The heterogeneity of PT and the weak methodological quality of studies limited the interpretation and the confidence in findings.

Long-lasting reduction in postural asymmetry by prism adaptation after right brain lesion without neglect.

BACKGROUND: Right brain damage (RBD) involves postural asymmetry and spatial frame disorders. In acute RBD patients, postural asymmetry is immediately reduced after one single session of prism adaptation (PA), without assessment of effects on spatial frames. AIM: To assess long-term effects of PA on posture and spatial frames in chronic RBD patients, without neglect. METHOD: Six chronic RBD patients without neglect (mean delay 45 months) were included. Each patient sustained 10 PA sessions of 20 min during 2 weeks. Outcome measures were: (1) posturographic analysis (mediolateral position of centre of pressure (X cop), (2) subjective straight ahead (SSA) and perception of longitudinal body axis (LBA). Each parameter was assessed by three pretests and three post-tests (+2 h, day + 3 and day + 7). RESULTS: In pretests, patients showed a shift of the X cop and SSA. In post-tests, results displayed (1) a significant reduction in mediolateral postural asymmetry at D + 7; (2) a significant left deviation of SSA at D + 3 and enduring at D + 7; and (3) no significant modification of LBA. The mean curves of X cop and SSA between pre- and post-tests were similar. CONCLUSIONS: PA involves persistent reduction in postural asymmetry in RBD patients without neglect. These findings were obtained at a chronic stage. This new effect cannot be explained by reduction in spatial attentional shift. Improvement may be explained by a better calibration of extra personal space frames used for posture, without effect on personal space frame. Findings argue in favour of a bottom-up effect of PA on mechanisms underlying spatial cognition.